 |
magazine / jf10
 |
January/February 2010 issue |
|
|
 |
INTERNATIONAL POLAR YEAR
Way and other participants in the CryoEX international student exchange head out for a day of fieldwork in Jotunheimen
National Park. Photo: Robert van Waarden
Cryosphere kid: Young Canadian scientist Robert Way travels to Norway to learn more about his home
Turbulent tundra: Global warming’s impact on Arctic tundra
Crossing the line: Observe changes in the tree line and examine its affect on Canada’s Arctic tundra
-
What is IPY?

International Polar Year (IPY) 2007-08 is a collaborative international effort to research the polar regions. Discover its key issues. Read more »
-
Community research station

At the Kluane Lake Research Station, what’s happening in the Arctic is a family affair. Read more »
-
Are the Inuit Healthy?

A mass health checkup of the Inuit attempts to set right a terrifying legacy left by the C.D. Howe. Read more »
-
The Arctic mercury mystery

Scientists rush to unlock why Mercury taints the Arctic air and what this means for the planet. Read more »
-
A Canadian scientist in Norway

Does sending a geography student to Norway offer the answer to fostering Arctic scientists of the future?
Read more »
-
The Future of Arctic Research

After the glut of International Polar Year funding evaporates, what does the future hold for Arctic exploration?
Read more »
-
Multimedia
Discover videos, interactive features and photo essays mapping the issues, science and communities behind the International Polar Year.
View now »
As easily as this story could be about climate change, it’s
not. Not directly, anyway — though it’s hard to resist linking
Way’s studies of the northern landscape with how the future
will look. “The State of Polar Research,” a report released last
February in conjunction with International Polar Year (IPY)
2007-08, declares that melting ice sheets in Greenland and
Antarctica are contributing to rising sea levels. Also of “great
societal relevance” are biodiversity loss, methane release from
thawing permafrost and changing sea currents, to name just
a few issues on which the International Council for Science
and the World Meteorological Organization, both IPY
sponsors, are calling for more research. With CryoEX, such
issues, though important, remain peripheral.
As a whole, the contingent of 17 students and professors
in Norway bears an apolitical quality. Individually, however,
opinions on how the world should react to climate change
fall along a well-defined continuum. On the left are Lars
Elmkoer Hansen and Anna-Marie Chwastek, a pair of young
Danes who work near Way in the rain, measuring lichen
diameter. They hope for progress at the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change in Copenhagen
in December. On the right is Humlum, a physical geography
professor and a renowned polar researcher who says data
shows that CO2 has less of an impact on global warming than
many people believe. Walking down the mountain after his
last measurements at a moraine deposited around 1960,
Storbreen sparkling turquoise behind him, Way says he
doesn’t think Humlum is right but he’s willing to listen.
“I’m open to a good debate,” says Way before coming to
a tumbling meltwater stream and hopscotching across on a
few large stones. Still, he adds, accepting anthropogenic
CO2 as the cause of Storbreen’s recent rapid shrinkage can’t
cause any problems. “What’s the worst that can happen? We
stop polluting so much?”
Bernd Etzelmüller, a professor in the University of Oslo’s
department of geosciences, didn’t co-create CryoEX to attain game-changing conclusions. In part, it was to fulfill the IPY
call for collaborative polar science. The best way to do that,
he says, is to generate researchers with international experience.
Gathering 15 students from Canada, Norway, Denmark,
Germany, Holland and the United States would have been
much more difficult in the past, says Etzelmüller. When he
arrived a decade ago from his native Germany to begin
work on Norwegian permafrost, he was a pioneer in his field.
Now, he says, “people understand you have to know what
is happening with the permafrost, with the glaciers, to know
what is happening with climate change.” So government
funding has finally begun to flow.
CryoEX bridges the University of Oslo and the University
of Ottawa — home base for the program’s other founder,
geography professor and faculty of arts dean Antoni
Lewkowicz — but funding comes only from the Norwegian
Centre for International Cooperation in Higher Education.
The case made in 2008 for securing 1.5 million Norwegian
krone (roughly $280,000) over three years from the centre
was strengthened, says Lewkowicz, by his co-operation with
Etzelmüller to map Yukon permafrost in 2006. They had
forged a link between institutions that do strong permafrost
and glacier research, says Lewkowicz, noting that while there are similarities between Canada and Norway, there are
also geographic differences that allow researchers from the
two countries to learn from each other.
“IPY encouraged us to organize into formal and informal
groups,” says Lewkowicz, to overcome “the limitations of
individual researchers.” There was also the fact that
Etzelmüller, who’d come to Canada on sabbatical, had
research equipment that would have cost Lewkowicz $4,000
per week to rent for their map-making project, which was
partially funded by IPY and will ultimately help predict
how thawing will affect residents and industry in the Yukon.
The Norwegian Centre recognized the spirit of collaboration
and the value it could have if applied to students.
“What they learn during this week, they don’t learn the
whole semester reading books,” says Etzelmüller. “This may
be the most important thing: to get the students into the field.”
| Comments on this article | Leave a comment | Your post really informative.It will be a growing area to watch this year. Like you say, comments keep the conversation going.They also provide additional insight to the readers and the bloggers. Comments offer a different perspective and put a "face" to the readership.Orange County Web Design
I am glad to read this post, its an interesting one. I am always searching for quality posts and articles and this is what I found here, I hope you will be adding more in future. Thanks
I wish I was a scientist, because I believe in what these are doing and I wish I could participate in determining the facts in this issue. There is a lot of science that I think most people are particularly unaware of and it's important the information get out. I envy the writer's ability to cover this story. The best I can do is bug my MP to get some traction on the issue. Good luck writer and scientists all. The north is Canada and we shouldn't forget about it.
Nice to read an article on another promising young Labradorian! Good Luck, Robert!!
Not really a cause for rejoicing. Dozens of reports indicate this ice is thin and that the Arctic has changed in a disastrous way. http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/02/21/arctic-ice.html
http://www.metronews.ca/ottawa/canada/article/414964melt-season-for-canadian-arctic-sea-ice-outpacing-global-average-study
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jan/25/melting-arctic-north-pole-explorers
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/sep/05/climatechange.sciencenews
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/02/science/earth/02arct.html
I was fortunate enough to do some research at KLRS with the University of Ottawa and let me tell you, Andy and the gang really make you feel at home. I wish you all the best with renovations and I hope to one day go back to the station to show my children how wonderful it is.
It's good to know that polar ice is increasing again: "A report from the US National Snow and Ice Data Center in Colorado finds that Arctic summer sea ice has increased by 409,000 square miles, or 26 per cent, since 2007."
|
|
 |