Subscribe and save!
magazine / jf03

January/February 2003 issue


Reverberations

No greedy miscreants
As a dedicated hunter and angler living in Alberta, I read the feature "Sacrificial ram" and the "Editor’s notebook" (CG Nov/Dec 2002) with great interest. While I have to agree with much of what you say about government cutbacks in this province and the questionable conduct of the Ministry of Sustainable Resource Development, I take exception to the image of hunters portrayed in these articles.

There is no game of "cat and mouse" between Alberta’s sportsmen and conservation officers. Sheep hunters follow the letter of the law as they take to the mountains to hunt rams. They are not hunting rams because of some perceived value that has been placed on the horns. They are hunting sheep because they are sheep hunters. These hunters are passionate about their heritage and see those who attempt to circumvent the rules as thieves and poachers.

Hunters and anglers are not the greedy, resource-exploiting miscreants your magazine would have readers believe. Sportsmen have been supporters of, and catalysts for, many regulations, closures and progressive management techniques. Their involvement is not akin to wolves looking after the sheep.
It’s unfortunate that the funding for wildlife management and research has fallen into the hands of these non-profit groups, but thankfully, there are enough dedicated members to donate their time and money to pick up the slack.

The minister’s hunt permits mark a new direction in the province, and whether this is fraught with pitfalls remains to be seen. But for now, it seems to be the only solution to dwindling dollars and manpower within his department. Is this real hunting? Legally, yes. Morally, that may be a question better left to individuals using the permits, not outsiders, to judge.

T. J. Schwanky, Cochrane, Alta.


Advertisement

I have watched with sad amusement the constant "reorganization-as-occupation" of Alberta’s various environmental departments. Ralph Klein and Mike Cardinal’s management of the environment is truly Laurel and Hardy-esque. We all know this government is anti-intellectual, but they’ve gone so far as to be anti-facts, anti-truth, anti-reality. No wonder most of us in this province have taken to calling Cardinal’s AB Sustainable Resource Development department by the acronym absurd.

Ann Lockwood, Vermilion, Alta.

I was amazed to learn how big-game hunting works in Alberta and how the Fish and Wildlife Management arm of the government has been cut back. The budgetary reductions have never been publicized to my knowledge — very short-sighted but in keeping with the arrogance of opening the walleye fishery on the minister’s favourite lake. Thanks for new knowledge of my home province.

John Lilley, Edmonton

Your article was both provocative and informative. Who would have thought that a wealthy province like Alberta would have to resort to desperate fundraising schemes to finance wildlife research and conservation? It is ironic that the province blessed with abundant areas of international significance lacks the vision to preserve and conserve our natural resources.

The Alberta response to Kyoto appears to underscore this myopia and reminds me of earlier objections to the need for vehicle-emission standards. If the rams are available for profit, why not the grizzly bears, whooping cranes, bald eagles, fossils from Dinosaur Provincial Park and water from the Bow River? A debate and an action plan are required. National wisdom must trump provincial jurisdiction.

The challenge to all could be summarized in the words of historian and author Stephen Ambrose: "In the 20th century, our best minds worked on how to conquer nature. In the 21st century, our best minds are going to work on how to restore nature."

Ted Hains, Toronto

Erosion myopia
I wonder whether Ed Struzik is being a bit historically myopic in his article on the Northwest Territories, "Changing courses" (CG Sept/Oct 2002), in attributing erosion of the Arctic coastline to modern-day global warming. In 1906-1907, well before the full-blown onset of climate change, Arctic explorer Vilhjalmur Stefansson made his first foray to the Beaufort Sea area, where he conducted archaeological work. In Hunters of the Great North, he observed, "It seems the north coast of Alaska is sinking gradually.… When a gale comes from the open sea, the waves will undermine the cliffs of the islands at a great rate so that the coastline sometimes recedes as much as a hundred yards in a single summer.… All sorts of ancient implements and other relics were being washed away by the sea."

Aaron Spitzer, Whitehorse

Front-line forecasters
I really enjoyed reading "Storm coast" (CG Nov/Dec 2002), particularly the last conversations between marine fore-caster Owen Lange and the ship. I do not know Mr. Lange personally, but I work for Environment Canada and can relate to what he went through during and following the events of that night, as can any of the front-line staff in weather centres. In some cases, such as the storm of October 2001, things develop so rapidly, there is little time to avoid tragedies. In others, despite the best information we provide, bad decisions are made, with tragic results. I can clearly recall a winter evening in the early 1980s, while working at the Sudbury Weather Office, when a pilot insisted on flying VFR [visual flight rules] to Toronto through snow squalls off Georgian Bay and Lake Huron. After receiving repeated warnings and being advised to take a safer route, which involved a big detour through Ottawa, he took off anyway, citing good weather at his departure and his destination locations. About an hour later, the ELT [emergency locator transmitter] went off in the flight service station adjacent to our office.

Most of my close colleagues who have worked in these offices have experienced such events on more than one occasion. Staff take their responsibilities very seriously and are very close to the users of the information we produce.

Etienne Grégoire, Embrun, Ont.

Online Reverberations additions

"Sacrificial Ram"
I had been a proud Albertan for 24 years but in recent years have found nothing to stand tall about. It seems that our province is slowly creeping towards becoming the 53rd state of our neighbour’s to the south. Your editor’s note as well as the "Sacrificial Ram" article (CG Nov/Dec 2002)made me take note of the path that Alberta is on. I would like to say that the opinion of our elected premier and his ministers does not sit well with me. It seems that our modern day North American Napoleon leader cannot take advice and bases his decisions on personal knowledge rather then facts. If its not drunken rants at an Edmonton homeless shelter, it is cuts to our health care and education, or spending millions of our taxpayers money fighting an environmental policy that will be beneficial to the world. Klein has taken it upon himself to make Alberta look like a province of uneducated, out of shape, rednecks. I only hope that we as Albertan’s finally say enough is enough, we’re tired of the embarrassment, and bring in a government that will listen and make decisions based on the best interest of not only Alberta but of Canada and the world.

Dale Nelson, Grande Prairie, Alta.

I am, I’m sure, one of many "retired" hunters who feel that the Liberal government’s laws on the long hunting weapons has eradicated hunting for the majority who can no longer take the constant harassment, abuse, paperwork and cost of being a hunter. Notwithstanding, your article was excellent but I had to read the article twice to determine if you were pro or con to the concept of "game farm hunting" with respect to the Alberta Big Horn Sheep. I believe you have concluded that in light of continued Klein cuts to departments whose goal may be contrary to big oil interests the only option is to succede to the "game ranch" concept. As distasteful as that is, I agree with you, but shouldn’t all of the provincial generated hunting license revenue be put back into re-establishing the environment that our predeceasors let denigrate? I do believe that oil revenue and some tax money should indeed be put back into the system to restore former habitat and stock. Pity Ralph Klein hasn’t got the idea yet. Thanks for an enlighting article.

Dennis

top

* Letters may be edited for length, accuracy and liability.





Digital Edition available now!



Canadian Geographic on Facebook

Canadian Geographic on YouTube

Canadian Geographic on Twitter
Meet our client partners
CG Contests
Featured Destinations
Smooth Operators
ADventures
Classifieds
Advertiser Directory
Popular tags
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
Canadian Geographic Magazine | Canadian Geographic Travel Magazine
Canadian Atlas Online | Canadian Travel | Mapping & Cartography | Canadian Geographic Photo Club | Kids | Canadian Contests | Canadian Lesson Plans | Blog

Royal Canadian Geographical Society | Canadian Council for Geographic Education | Geography Challenge | Canadian Award for Environmental Innovation

Jobs | Internships | Submission Guidelines

© 2012 Canadian Geographic Enterprises